As part of my drive towards the use of logic-driven punctuation, I must heartily recommend this post on why it is "vitally necessary to prevent the extinction of the serial comma". As with everything else, it cannot be blindly used: there are cases where a blindly applied serial comma can create, not resolve, ambiguity. I repudiate such reprehensible misuse of punctuation. However, in most cases it serves to disambiguate lists and to clarify information, and in general I prefer to err on the side of too many, rather than too few, commas.
The purpose of punctuation in a language like English must be to convey something of intonation and reading pauses, which are critical to conveying meaning and which cannot be indicated in the language itself, since English lacks the kind of particles that German or Sanskrit possess. Punctuation is like salt: everybody has their preferred levels, but there is always such a thing as too much, and such a thing as too little, of it.
Just a place to jot down my musings.
Sunday, October 24, 2010
For the preservation of the Oxford / Harvard / serial comma
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Tag Cloud
aesthetics
algorithms
alternative
Appayya Dīkṣita
Arabic
astronomy
beauty
Bengal
Bharatiyar
Britain
Cantor
castles
cathedrals
China
cinema
Classical India
coding
comics
consciousness
cricket
deconstruction
development
Dharma
differential geometry
dolphins
economics
education
English
entrepreneurship
environment
evolution
fast bowling
finance
French
fundamentalism
German
Ghalib
Goda Stuti
grammar
Hafez
Haskell
hatred
Hindi
Hinduism
history
Hobbit
India
IPL
Islam
Japanese
Jurassic Park
Jurassic World
Khayyam
Kuvalayānanda
Laghusiddhāntakaumudī
languages
LaTeX
Latin
liberal arts
literature
logic
Lord of the Rings
maps
mathematics
Mīmāṃsā
monuments
music
narrative
Nyāya
Orhan Pamuk
Pakistan
Pāṇini
Persian
philosophy
physics
poetry
prosody
Punjabi
quatrains
religion
rock
rubaiyat
Sanskrit
Sarasvatī
science fiction
Sherlock Holmes
sociology
space
speculation
Śrī Vedānta Deśika
states
statistics
Swadharma
systems
Tamil
Taoism
The Atlantic
theology
Tolkien
travel
Turkish
Tyāgarāja
Urdu
Vedānta
West Indies
whales
wisdom
Why pearls, and why strung at random?
In his translation of the famous "Turk of Shiraz" ghazal of Hafez into florid English, Sir William Jones, the philologist and Sanskrit scholar and polyglot extraordinaire, transformed the following couplet:
غزل گفتی و در سفتی بیا و خوش بخوان حافظ
که بر نظم تو افشاند فلک عقد ثریا را
into:
Go boldly forth, my simple lay,
Whose accents flow with artless ease,
Like orient pearls at random strung.
The "translation" is terribly inaccurate, but worse, the phrase is a gross misrepresentation of the highly structured organization of Persian poetry. Regardless, I picked it as the name of my blog for a number of reasons:
1) I don't expect the ordering of my posts to follow any rhyme or reason
2) Since "at random strung" is a rather meaningless phrase, I decided to go with the longer but more pompous "pearls at random strung". I rest assured that my readers are unlikely to deduce from this an effort on my part to arrogate some of Hafez's peerless brilliance!
About Me
- Gokul Madhavan
- Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
- What is this life if, full of care,
We have no time to stand and stare.
—W.H. Davies, “Leisure”
No comments:
Post a Comment